[Portuguese] JIL Wallet and MetaMask are both non-custodial wallets, but they serve different markets with different security models. MetaMask stores private keys in browser local storage, primarily serving Ethereum and EVM chain DeFi users. JIL Wallet uses MPC 2-of-3 threshold signing targeting institutional users who require compliance infrastructure, protection coverage, and multi-chain support beyond EVM ecosystems.
[Portuguese] Browser extension wallets store keys in software memory accessible to the browser environment, making them vulnerable to phishing attacks, malicious browser extensions, and website exploits. For institutional-scale assets, this risk profile is unacceptable. MPC custody eliminates the single-point-of-failure risk inherent in browser-based key storage.
[Portuguese] JIL Wallet eliminates single-point-of-failure risk through MPC key splitting. No single device or party ever holds the complete key. The wallet supports 13 chains (including non-EVM: Bitcoin, Solana, XRP, Stellar, Cosmos), adds $250K automatic protection, post-quantum cryptography, biometric identity verification, and regulatory compliance tools.
For institutional use, yes. JIL provides MPC key splitting (no browser key storage risk), $250K protection, 13-chain support including non-EVM chains, and compliance tools. MetaMask is designed for individual DeFi users on EVM chains.
JIL Wallet supports Ethereum and 12 other blockchains. The wallet provides institutional-grade security for interacting with on-chain applications.